<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chiswick High Road Action Group &#187; Successes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/category/successes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk</link>
	<description>A community interest group working to support Chiswick as a mixed and diverse town centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 23:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Lend Lease Opus Collection &#8211; the legal fightback is funded</title>
		<link>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/opus-collection-chiswick-monstrosity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/opus-collection-chiswick-monstrosity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2015 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Successes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-proposed.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Proposed Action" title="Proposed Action" /><img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-success.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Successes" title="Successes" /><br/>The challenge brought by local resident Simon Kverndal QC against the Lend Lease development of Empire House and Essex place was adjourned until September in the High Court today. Local residents donated a total of £20,035 towards legal fees for<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/opus-collection-chiswick-monstrosity/">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-proposed.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Proposed Action" title="Proposed Action" /><img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-success.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Successes" title="Successes" /><br/><p>The challenge brought by local resident Simon Kverndal QC against the Lend Lease development of Empire House and Essex place was adjourned until September in the High Court today.</p>
<p><strong>Local residents donated a total of £20,035 towards legal fees for the case. Following a short hearing, the judge decided that as it was a complex case involving &#8220;substantive planning issues&#8221; it needed more than the time allocated.</strong></p>
<p>The next hearing will be in September 2015.</p>
<p>Mr Kverndal and his supporters were seeking permission for a judicial review of Hounslow Council’s granting of planning permission to the development. The claim is that the decision was unlawful because of the failure of Officers to properly consult and their failure to take into account and apply important local planning policies.</p>
<p class="style8"><img src="http://www.chiswickw4.com/info/images/empirehouseplanlatest.jpg" alt="" width="258" height="144" /></p>
<p class="style8"><span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">The development consists of 72 residential units, including affordable homes, in Essex Place and Acton Lane. The Empire House tower block is currently being refurbished from office to residential, on sale as The Opus Collection, with new retail frontage of seven units planned below.</span></p>
<p class="style8">The Judicial Review application being taken by Simon Kverndal QC, is supported by local lawyers and four residents’ groups, challenging the legality of the planning decision.</p>
<p>The residents groups supporting the challenge include all four neighbouring groups: Friends of Turnham Green, Chiswick High Road Action Group, West Chiswick and Gunnersbury Society and Acton Green Residents’ Association.</p>
<p>The challenge is based on the following:</p>
<p>&#8211; <strong>Height</strong> of buildings – Local policies are against tall buildings in this area and there is a long standing aspiration to get rid of Empire House.</p>
<p>&#8211; <strong>Employment</strong> – The local plan site designation for this site provided for mainly continued employment uses such as offices or hotel space.</p>
<p>&#8211; <strong>Heritage</strong> &#8211; The proposed development will cause irreparable harm to the Turnham Green Conservation area.</p>
<p>&#8211; <strong>Housing</strong> &#8211; The development seeks to get round Hounslow’s policies on affordable housing by claiming the right to develop Empire House with no affordable housing contribution and the remainder of the site with only a fraction of the 41% affordable housing target. The result is just 11% affordable housing. All this is based on claims as to viability of the project based on calculations that have not been disclosed.</p>
<p>&#8211; <strong>Consultation</strong> – Officers recommended approval of this development despite strong opposition from the overwhelming majority of respondents to consultation. There were comprehensive objections from residents, residents’ groups and Sainsbury’s who own the adjoining superstore and car park together with British Land. These were ignored. In a final blow, the Council refused to allow time to examine and respond to a substantial amount of important documentation put in at the last minute, well after the consultation period was over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/opus-collection-chiswick-monstrosity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>394 Chiswick High Road &#8211; Planning Apps Scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/394-chiswick-high-road-planning-apps-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/394-chiswick-high-road-planning-apps-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Successes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-success.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Successes" title="Successes" /><br/>&#160; Site:  394 CHISWICK HIGH ROAD CHISWICK  LONDON W4 5TF     Development: Replacement of existing shop front and installation of new air conditioning units to the rear elevation     The Council received observations from you concerning the above, proposed development and I<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/394-chiswick-high-road-planning-apps-scrutiny/">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-success.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Successes" title="Successes" /><br/><p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="163"><b>Site:</b></td>
<td></td>
<td valign="top" width="506"><b><span style="color: #000000;"> 394 CHISWICK HIGH ROAD CHISWICK  LONDON W4 5TF</span></b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="163"><b><span style="color: #000000; font-size: medium;"> </span></b></td>
<td></td>
<td valign="top" width="506"><b><span style="color: #000000; font-size: medium;"> </span></b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="163"><b>Development:</b></td>
<td></td>
<td valign="top" width="506"><span style="color: #000000;"><b>Replacement of existing shop front and installation of new air conditioning units to the rear elevation</b><b></b></span></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="163"><b><span style="color: #000000; font-size: medium;"> </span></b></td>
<td></td>
<td valign="top" width="506"><b><span style="color: #000000; font-size: medium;"> </span></b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">The Council received observations from you concerning the above, proposed development and I am now writing to inform you that on 20/06/2013 the decision on the above application was Refused. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">If you would like to view the decision notice and the legal agreement you can do so by looking on the council’s web site: <a href="http://www.hounslow.gov.uk/" target="_blank">www.hounslow.gov.uk</a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">&#8211; Select: Environment and Planning</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">&#8211; Select: Planning</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">&#8211; Select: Search for applications and input the above reference number.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I would like to thank you for the observations made on this application.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Yours faithfully</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Mr A Richards</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Assistant Director Community Safety, Environment and Regulatory Services</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/394-chiswick-high-road-planning-apps-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PictureHouse Cinema agrees to altering proposed opening hours</title>
		<link>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/picturehouse-cinema-agrees-to-altering-proposed-opening-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/picturehouse-cinema-agrees-to-altering-proposed-opening-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 02:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Successes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-success.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Successes" title="Successes" /><br/>Following comments from the Chiswick High Road Action Group, PictureHouse Cinema agreed to altering the proposed opening hours. The Chiswick High Road Action Group (CHRAG) welcomes, in principle, the proposal to convert the premises formerly occupied by the Ballet Rambert<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/picturehouse-cinema-agrees-to-altering-proposed-opening-hours/">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/icons/chiswick-action-group-action-success.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Successes" title="Successes" /><br/><p>Following comments from the Chiswick High Road Action Group, PictureHouse Cinema agreed to altering the proposed opening hours.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">The Chiswick High Road Action Group (CHRAG) welcomes, in principle, the proposal to convert the premises formerly occupied by the Ballet Rambert to a Picturehouse multi-screen cinema. We feel that this will be a positive addition to the leisure/cultural amentites of Chiswick.</span></p>
<div><span style="color: #000000;">We are pleased to note the proposals are for redevelopment of the existing buildings and are largely contained within the existing building envelope. Refurbishment of the traditional Victorian frontages at 96 and 98 and improvements to the frontage of 94 are positive design features. In design terms, we consider that the signage for the building will be very important and we note that this will be the subject of a separate application.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000;">Aspects of the proposal on which CHRAG has concerns relate to the impact on residents in terms of noise/disturbance due to the proposed hours of operation and parking. As stated in the applicant&#8217;s Planning Report &#8221; <span style="font-family: ArialMT; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: ArialMT; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: ArialMT; font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">Chiswick town centre is characterised by the high number of</span><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">residential properties in close proximity to the centre and its commercial uses.&#8221; This intimate residential/commercial mix contributes to the character and success of Chiswick town centre but the high residential element does impose certain constraints on commercial activities.</span></span></span></span> We consider the proposal that the premises including the cafe/bars stay open until 1 or 1.30 am is inappropriate and unreasonable in this location, especially as one of the bars is located on a roof terrace. We request that earlier closing times be stipulated; we suggest that 23.30, Sunday to Thursday and 24.00 (midnight), Friday and Saturday might be more acceptable. In this context it is noted that the Riverside Studios in Hammersmith has the following closing times: Monday to Saturday, 23.00 and Sunday, 22.30.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="color: #000000;">As far as parking is concerned, we recommend that further analysis is carried out. The data in the Traffic Report appear to suggest that there is adequate spare capacity within the surrounding residential streets. The fact that the streets are within CPZs and that these operate from Monday to Saturday from 9.00 to 19.00 suggest high parking pressure, especially during business hours. Pay and display spaces restrict parking to two hours within these times and would not therefore be suitable for cinema clientele. In any case, we request that the company be required by Condition to actively encourage use of public transport in all its publicity and booking information, prior to and after opening. We would also ask that the company seek to provide an on-site disabled parking place.</span></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chiswickactiongroup.org.uk/picturehouse-cinema-agrees-to-altering-proposed-opening-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
