It would be interesting to hear the @TfL justification for taking pavement space not road space.

— Ed Schroeder (@edlovespixels) October 7, 2017

Promoting cycling should be at the expense of cars not pedestrians. Stupid planning.

— Gavin Ireland (@GofasterIreland) October 9, 2017

Needs a thorough look. I find cycling along the High Road is OK. Need to consider impact on pedestrians.

— Angela Brown (@AngelaOnHerBike) September 25, 2017

No you reduce traffic by reducing roadspace allocated to motor vehicles. Conversely increasing space induces more motor traffic.

— bigbluemeanie (@bigbluemeanie) October 9, 2017

Agreed - taking space away from pedestrians is hardly making the streets greener and safer

— Clare Price Williams (@ClaraPW) October 6, 2017

I wish the borough had courage to reduce motor raffic space instead of pavement but thats not a good enough argument to keep the statusquo

— Raphael ZY (@raphael3zy) October 5, 2017

Reducing the pavement and taking down our beautiful giant trees is not the right solution. I’m concerned about how I (and other blind ppl)

— Cynthia (@Cyn_B_) October 5, 2017

I'm afraid 'done properly' 'sufficient space' are a sort of refuge. Have you seen what's proposed for Chiswick High Road? Inherent conflict.

— Rita Krishna (@rita_krshn) October 9, 2017